Do you think this is a good topic for my research paper?

April 82010

This assignment is for my Psychological Issues and Social Values class.

My professor stated that my paper could address cultural, social and racial issues as they affect the therapeutic process, historical framework of the problem, and trends in problem solving, alternative and integrative ways of treating the problems. I will also have to present my paper to the class.

This my topic or question per se: Why is psychological counseling taboo in the African American community?

I like the topic. It is one that needs more exploration.Go for it!

Can someone please help me understand my Medical Benefits?

April 62010

Ok guys and gals. I need some help understanding my medical benefits.

I am looking to get Rotator Cuff Surgery but need to understand how much I am looking to pay.

If it helps anyone I have the Kaiser "KP Classic" Plan.

Here are the details of my plan:
Type of Service Copay or Coinsurance
Professional Services (Plan Provider Office Visits)
Primary/Specialty Care $15.00 copay
No Payment
Provider Group Visit $7.00 copay
No Payment
Routine Physical $15.00 copay
No Payment
Well Baby/Child (0-23 Months) $5.00 copay
No Payment
Eye (Refraction) Exam $15.00 copay
No Payment
Hearing Exam/Test $15.00 copay
No Payment
Family Planning Counseling $15.00 copay
No Payment
Scheduled Prenatal Care Visits $5.00 copay
No Payment
First Postpartum Visit $5.00 copay
No Payment
Physical, Occupational, and Speech Therapy Visit $15.00 copay
No Payment
Dialysis Related Office Visit No Payment
Care Management Visit No Payment
Case Management Visit No Payment
Outpatient Services
Allergy Injections $3.00 copay
No Payment
Allergy Testing $15.00 copay
No Payment
Chemotherapy No Payment
Day Surgery Transgender Not Covered
Dialysis Care $15.00 copay
No Payment
Imaging (X-rays) No Payment
Immunizations No Payment
Infusion Therapy Services No Payment
Laboratory Services for Preventative Care No Payment
Laboratory Tests No Payment
MRI, PET, CT Scan No Payment
Outpatient Surgery (including Conscious Sedation) $15.00 copay
No Payment
Radiation Therapy Pre 2008 No Payment
Special Procedures No Payment
Tuberculosis Testing (PPD) No Payment
Ultraviolet Light Treatment No Payment
Preventative Services
Routine Physical $15.00 copay
No Payment
Well Baby/Child (0-23 Months) $5.00 copay
No Payment
Audiology and Vision Screening No Payment
Eye (Refraction) Exam $15.00 copay
No Payment
Family Planning Counseling $15.00 copay
No Payment
Hearing Exam/Test $15.00 copay
No Payment
Immunizations No Payment
Laboratory Services for Preventative Care No Payment
Office Dispensed Contraceptive No Payment
Preventative Services Imaging (includes Preventative Mammograms) No Payment
Scheduled Prenatal Care Visits $5.00 copay
No Payment
Sigmoidoscopy Screening $15.00 copay
No Payment
Tuberculosis Testing (PPD) No Payment
Imaging and Laboratory
Imaging (X-rays) No Payment
Preventative Services Imaging (includes Preventative Mammograms) No Payment
MRI, PET, CT Scan No Payment
Laboratory Services for Preventative Care No Payment
Laboratory Tests No Payment
Therapy/Rehab
Multidisciplinary Rehabilitation – Inpatient No Payment
Multidisciplinary Rehabilitation – Outpatient $15.00 copay
No Payment
Musculoskeletal Therapy Not Covered
Physical, Occupational, and Speech Therapy Visit $15.00 copay
No Payment
Respiratory Therapy $15.00 copay
No Payment
Vision Service
Eye (Refraction) Exam $15.00 copay
No Payment
Primary/Specialty Care $15.00 copay
No Payment
Lenses for Aniridia No Payment
Lens Fitting for Aniridia No Payment
Lenses for Aphakia (0-9 yrs) No Payment
Lens Fitting for Aphakia No Payment
Women’s Health Services
Primary/Specialty Care $15.00 copay
No Payment
Office Dispensed Contraceptive No Payment
Scheduled Prenatal Care Visits $5.00 copay
No Payment
Fetal Non Stress Test No Payment
First Postpartum Visit $5.00 copay
No Payment
Elective Termination of Pregnancy $15.00 copay
No Payment
Therapeutic Abortion $15.00 copay
No Payment
Inpatient Obstetrical Care and Delivery No Payment
Family Planning Services
Family Planning Counseling $15.00 copay
No Payment
Office Dispensed Contraceptive No Payment
Sterilization (Outpatient Hospital Setting) $15.00 copay
No Payment
Elective Termination of Pregnancy $15.00 copay
No Payment
Infertility Treatment
Infertility Office Visits 50.00% coins
Infertility Imaging (X-rays) 50.00% coins
Infertility Laboratory Tests 50.00% coins
Infertility Special Procedures 50.00% coins
Infertility Outpatient Surgery 50.00% coins
Infertility Hospital Inpatient Care 50.00% coins
Health Education
Health Education Group Visit No Payment
Health Education Individual Visit $15.00 copay
No Payment
Smoking Cessation No Payment
Hospitalization Services
Hospital Inpatient Care No Payment
Inpatient Obstetrical Care and Delivery No Payment
Multidisciplinary Rehabilitation – Inpatient No Payment
Hospital Inpatient Care Transgender Not Covered
Inpatient Detoxification No Payment
Inpatient Psychiatric Care (Parity) No Payment
Inpatient Psychiatric Care (Non-Parity) No Payment
Emergency Health Coverage
Emergency Care (waived if admitted) $50.00 copay
No Payment
Emergency Department Observation Only $50.00 copay
No Payment
Urgent Care $15.00 copay
No Payment
Mental Health Service
Medication Management $15.00 copay

Here’s a neat suggestion! Pick up your telephone & dial the toll free number for Kaiser Insurance Company. Listen to all the information to decide which number to push for the information you need. That’s what high premium costs for health insurance are for – to pay people to give out that information to it’s policy holders!

gov health care n suicide offered

April 62010

From the state of Oregon. This is just one of the examples of what we can expect, on a much larger scale, should the democrats pass health care reform. End of Life Counseling, will replace treatment. To bad, mom and dad, Unca Obama says you cost to much…

Duration : 0:3:45

Read the rest of this entry »

How often is this happening with illegals in the USA?Fate of US-born kid of illegal immigrants unclear?

April 42010

Fate of US-born kid of illegal immigrants unclear
http://www.magicvalley.com/articles/2009/07/01/ap/us/d995oc0g0.txt
By KATE BRUMBACK
LAWRENCEVILLE, Ga. – His mother isn’t in the picture. His illegal immigrant father was deported.

Now, the 13-year-old waits for a Georgia court to decide his fate. Among the options: keeping the boy in the only country he’s ever lived in, but as a ward of the state, or sending him to his father in Guatemala, a country he’s never seen.

It’s a tangled case that defies easy solutions. The boy is a U.S. citizen and says he wants to stay in his native country. His father, a bus driver without regular work, says he would gladly take his child _ though he agrees the boy would be better off in the U.S.

But the teen has a history of behavioral problems, which make him hard to place with a foster family. His older brother, who is 16, lives with relatives in the U.S. But they have other children and are unable to care for the boy because of his problems.

A lawyer hired to represent the boy’s interests says the state appears to be looking for a way to send him to Guatemala against his wishes, a move she likened to deportation.

Beatriz Illescas Putzeys, Guatemala’s consul general in Atlanta, said she usually argues for family reunification, but in this case she is prepared to argue that the boy should stay here because he is a U.S. citizen and would have access to better education and counseling.

"It is highly unusual, totally unusual," Illescas Putzeys said. "What I have been dealing with most of the time is trying to get children sent back to Guatemala to their families."

The boy was born in Los Angeles in December 1995 to illegal immigrants _ a father from Guatemala and a mother from El Salvador. His mother later abandoned the family and her whereabouts are unknown, according to Rebeca Salmon, a lawyer hired by the boy’s court-appointed guardian. The boy’s father, Edgar Ovidio Juares, 40, was arrested in June 2007 and deported to Guatemala last year, he told a lawyer in Guatemala.

In a recent phone interview with The Associated Press, Juares was conflicted about his son’s fate. He said he wanted to have his son in Guatemala with him, but acknowledged the boy’s quality of life would be better in the U.S.

"I don’t want to lose contact with my son," he said, speaking in a mix of Spanish and English. "I want him here, but here it is hard to help him with the problems he has because we don’t have much money.

"He said to me he doesn’t want to come here," Juares said.

Salmon asked the AP not to identify the boy to protect his privacy. The case is being handled in Gwinnett County Juvenile Court, and juvenile cases are generally sealed to protect the child.

Salmon said she was hired by the boy’s court-appointed guardian who believes the state plans to ask the court to send him to his father. She does not believe that is best for the child. The Associated Press has filed a motion seeking to open the court proceedings to the media to hear the discussion about what is in the child’s best interest.

The boy has been in foster care since his father’s arrest and has been moved from one home to another, nine in all, over about two years, Salmon said. She described him as rebellious and said he needs counseling. He now lives in a group home, but Salmon said she is seeking therapeutic placement for him. That would put him in a group home or with a family that is trained to handle children with special needs.

"Instead of solving the problems he has, he’s just been shuffled from one place to another, and now they’re out of places and they are trying to send him to a foreign country," Salmon said.

In an e-mail earlier this year, the state’s Department of Human Resources, which oversees the Division of Family and Children Services, asked Guatemalan officials for a home evaluation for the family in Guatemala. An agency spokeswoman, Dena Smith, declined to comment on the state’s plans for the boy, but said its priorities for every child are safety and permanency.

"Legally, we cannot talk about any open case of any child," Smith said. "Case plans are individualized and are based on the needs of the individual child."

A Guatemalan official wrote a letter to the Georgia child welfare division in July 2008 stating that the boy’s aunt in Guatemala said he would be better off in the U.S. because of his "psychological and behavioral problems."

A more detailed home study was done in early 2009. A translation of the report provided to the AP says Juares lives with his father, the boy’s paternal grandfather, that both are interested in having custody of the child, and it appears they can care for and protect him. But it also recommends the child’s rights as a U.S. citizen, including access to a better quality of life, be taken into account.

The report says the grandfather, who is 67, earns up to $616 a month farming his land and operating corn mills. Juares ear

These children shouldn’t be American citizens in the first place. This is an easy question. End Birthright Citizenship and deport children with their illegal parents. Nice, clean and simple. How much money are the taxpayers of this country going to have to shell out for the irresponsibility of illegals.

End Birthright Citizenship!
Support the SAVE Act!

www.numbersusa.com

Classroom Presentation on Empathy as a Therapeutic Quality

April 32010

Me giving a presentation to my addiction counseling class on empathy as a quality of therapists. We used Becoming Naturally Therapeutic by Jacquelyn Small as the bases of our presentations.

Duration : 0:8:16

Read the rest of this entry »

Human Services help pls?

April 22010

The SREB in 1979 identified a classification for thirteen functional roles for human service workers.
Linkage/Advocacy; Therapeutic EnvironmentalControl; Administration/Management; Treatment/PLanning.
Evaluation; Education; Research; and Counseling
Linkage/Advocacy; Education; Administration; Treatment.
Treatment/Planning; Administration/Management; Linkage/Advocacy; Education/Counseling.
None of the above. The SREB prefers the generalist nonclassified identification.

The ability to work with consumers to provide "across the board" services, to work in a variety of settings; to work cooperatively with all professions, and to offer a number of therapeutic services describes:
A human service worker.
A generalist.
A subspecialist.
All of the above.
a and b above.

Culture as multilevel means

culture operates on two levels.

culture operates on three levels.

culture operates on four levels.

culture operates on several levels simultaneously.

c and d above are correct.

Which best describes personal culture
the entirety of a person’s meaning system and usual behavior.
a person’s ethnicity, sex, race, class, religion, and sexual orientation.
a person’s values and goals.
b and c above
none of the above.

Which best describes ethnic group
the race and culture of a group
the common heritage shared by a group
associated beliefs and behavior systems that are generally passed on through learning to the next generation.
b and c are correct
all of the above are correct

1) B
2) A
3) D
4) C
5) A

Why Art Therapy – Carrie Wicks

March 312010

Art Psychotherapist Carrie Wicks explains her approach to Art Therapy and what makes Art Therapy particularly effective for personal growth.

Duration : 0:1:53

Read the rest of this entry »

Why does the Liberal media promotes promiscuity and abortions,?

March 302010

According to the Time headline last week, a new study finds that the abortion pill RU-486 is “safe.” The only drug approved by the FDA that is designed to end human life, rather than improve it, “doesn’t increase risks” said the Chicago Tribune headline.

These headlines take deception in journalism to a whole new level. During the last Congress, I served as counsel to the House subcommittee on drug policy that investigated the FDA’s approval of RU-486. Anyone who seriously examines the highly irregular approval process and the serious adverse events associated with this drug can only conclude that it poses a deadly danger to women and should be removed from the market.

Following confirmation by the FDA in late 2005 that four women died from a rare bacterial infection after taking RU-486, Congressman Mark Souder, then-chairman of the House Subcommittee on Criminal Justice, Drug Policy and Human Resources, initiated a year-long investigation of how the FDA was handling RU-486 and addressing the adverse events associated with it. The subcommittee gathered thousands of documents from the FDA, conducted dozens of interviews, and held a congressional hearing, “RU-486: Demonstrating a Low Standard for Women’s Health?” Ultimately, the subcommittee published an extensive staff report on the drug, recommending its immediate removal from the market.

The report, “FDA and RU-486: Lowering the Standard for Women’s Health” summarizes a mountain of evidence about this drug’s serious and unpredictable danger to women, detailing the reasons that the drug should be immediately withdrawn from the market. Here are just some highlights: RU-486 was fraudulently approved; it has caused the deaths of at least eight women (that are known); and it is at least ten times deadlier than its surgical alternative.

RU-486 is actually a two-drug combination that first blocks nutrition from the developing embryo, which kills it, then causes the uterus to contract and expel the contents. It was approved in the waning days of the Clinton presidency under a highly unusual and specialized federal provision called Subpart H, which applies only to drugs that treat “serious or life-threatening illnesses and that provide a meaningful therapeutic benefit” over existing treatments.

RU-486 doesn’t even come close to meeting the Subpart H criteria: a normal pregnancy is not a serious or life-threatening illness (RU-486 is contraindicated for ectopic pregnancies); and surgical alternatives are safer for the mother. In short, FDA violated its own regulations to approve RU-486. (The advocacy group Judicial Watch has a detailed report on the Clinton administration’s drive to approve RU-48; and a Citizens Petition filed against the FDA on behalf of Concerned Women for America, the American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists, and Christian Medical Association offers a comprehensive account of the approval violations committed on behalf of RU-486 approval.)

RU-486 has caused a tremendously high rate of adverse events relative to the number of women who have taken the drug. As of last year, when the FDA provided information to the Subcommittee for its investigation, RU-486 had caused the deaths of at least eight women, nine life-threatening incidents, 232 hospitalizations, 116 blood transfusions, and 88 cases of infection. In total, we knew of more than 1070 adverse event cases associated with RU-486, out of only 575,000 prescriptions at most. This is even more alarming in light of the fact that adverse event reporting is notoriously low for any drug, much less a drug associated with abortion, for which reporting is expected to be even lower.

Finally, as explained in detail in The New England Journal of Medicine, RU-486 abortion (sometimes called “medical abortion”) is at least ten times more fatal than its surgical alternative. The figure, based on the most conservative numbers available, compares deaths from RU-486 abortion (a rate of 1 per 100,000) to surgical abortion before eight weeks (a rate of 0.1 per 100,000).

Now, just a few interesting facts about the business and manufacturing of this drug: Danco, the company that imports and distributes RU-486 (under the trade name of Mifeprex), is not a U.S. company, but is based in the Cayman Islands; RU-486 is its only product (making a voluntary withdrawal highly unlikely); and Danco imports RU-486 from that paragon of safe-product production, China.

So what are the options for actually withdrawing this drug from the market? There is a bill in the House that would suspend approval of RU-486 pending a Comptroller General review of the FDA’s initial approval. But approval could be reinstated after a favorable Comptroller General review. The FDA has authority, under a few provisions, for withdrawing a drug unilaterally, such as when a drug cannot be used safely despite restrictions, but it’s highly unlikely the FDA would pursue this course of action. The best current option for withdrawal of RU-486 rests with the Secretary of Health and Human Services, who has “Imminent Hazard” authority to remove a drug from the market under certain criteria (such as the unpredictability and severity of adverse events associated with a drug).

Returning to the mendacious headlines claiming RU-486 is “safe,” the careful reader will note that the study prompting this recent PR blitz lauding the abortion pill was not about the safety of RU-486 as a drug, or even as a form of abortion. The study was a comparison of subsequent pregnancy outcomes among women who had prior abortions, concluding that there was no difference between surgical or medical abortion on the impact on subsequent pregnancy.

However, abortion in general poses some risk to subsequent pregnancy; so to say there is no difference in long-term risk after having a medical versus surgical abortion is like saying there is no difference in long-term risk after getting into a traffic accident in a sedan versus a motorcycle. It ignores the fact that traffic accidents are dangerous, and motorcycle accidents are much more deadly.

The #1 cause of abortion, is, was, and always will be the stigma on unwed mothers from the conservative right.

After promising to outlaw abortiton, they were in power for 6 years, and never did.

Conservatives are liars who want abortion.

what grade would you give me and why?

March 282010

purpose of paper was to basically talk a bout a treatmetn approach and relate it to a certain population. I chose motivational interviewing and did it on college students.

I’ve alreadty submitted it to my professor via email so let me know what you think plzzzz
Some college students have alcohol for different reasons such as social parties, celebrations, and/or stressful events as well. There are many factors that fit in to why college students binge drink for which result in long-term health risks. College students drink a variety of alcoholic beverages from light to heavy alcoholic beverages that increase health risks and psychological health risks such as heart diseases and brain abnormalities. Treatments such as motivational interviewing can help lessen the consumption of alcohol and allow the college students who binge drink to slowly recover from this disease they have developed of binge drinking. Motivational interviewing is an effective treatment for college students who drink excessive amounts of alcohol in that it allows a person to freely choose to change their behavior to drink.
Motivational interviewing is a style of counseling that can be used throughout the therapeutic process (Jarvis, Tebbutt, Mattick & Shand, p.45). Since college students struggle with changing their habits and making a decision to change motivational drinking is a good technique in helping them with that problem. Binge drinking is a common problem that many college students are facing throughout their college lives. There are many alcoholic specific treatments that offer a wide range of help to allow those who suffer from binge drinking to be able to recovery from the alcoholic abuse. Yet, motivational interviewing can be used to begin the process of thinking about changing their ways on drinking (Jarvis, Tebbutt, Mattick & Shand, p.45). Motivational interviewing allows a person to no longer drink anymore and resolve standing issues that cause them to drink in the first place. Motivational interviewing will allow oneself to make his or her own choices in deciding to stop excessive drinking patterns and set a plan to change the alcoholic behavior.
The key to motivational interviewing is to give motivation and offer some hope to your client in order for them to change their ways on drinking. There are certain types of styles of listening when using this technique of motivational interviewing treatment. One is empathy in where the therapist puts themselves in the same position as the patients and allows a relationship to develop with the client, which can allow the client to change (Jarvis, Tebbutt, Mattick & Shand, p.46). The goal for motivational interviewing is to have your client talk about deciding to change the use of alcohol. Traditional confrontations methods such as offensive tactics that are both unhelpful and counter-protective in getting the client to change and therefore motivational interviewing avoids and confrontational tactics (Jarvis, Tebbutt, Mattick & Shand, p.46).
Findings show how alcohol has its downfall with individuals and the outcomes for it are hazardous. Means comparisons indicated that both groups showed reductions in alcohol-related problems, however, only the Motivational Interviewing sample evidenced significant reductions in binge drinking (Feldstein, S., & Forcehimes, A., 2007). Misuse of alcohol can lead to a wide range of consequences, the most severe being alcohol abuse, dependence, and death (Devos-Comby, L. & Lange, J., 2008). The median number of drinks in a row that a college man or women must have to be called a binge drinker is 6 for a man and 5 for a woman (Wechsler, H., & Kuo, M. (2000).
Treatments such as motivational interviewing can benefit specifically college students who drink alcohol in sororities or fraternities that, binge drink.
There are a couple of successful ways in which binge drinking can be helped. Findings show that more education and provision of coping skills training during treatment may influence self-efficacy by increasing the coping resources of a patient with SUD (McKellar, Ilgen & Moos, 2008). The method to motivational interviewing is to have direct listening skills with the patient in that you listen well to what the patient says and give positive feedback to the person (Jarvis, Tebbutt, Mattick & Shand, p.47). Also
The present findings suggest that individuals who report the greatest initial improvements in alcohol-related problems and impulsivity may have difficulty maintaining a high level of self-efficacy (McKellar, Ilgen & Moos, 2008). One brief intervention, motivational interviewing (MI) has shown efficacy in reducing alcohol-related problems in college samples (Feldstein, S., & Forcehimes, A., 2007). When compared with MI, other interventions have also reduced student drinking, necessitating the inclusion of a control condition when evaluating MI (motivational interviewing) (Feldstein, S., & Forcehimes, A., 2007). While par

Do you want the honest truth?

Depending on the grade you’re in, I would give you a C maybe. There are dozens of run on sentences and extra words that don’t need to be there.

I would suggest having a parent or older friend proof read it and make corrections accordingly.

Vancouver Hypnotherapy – Grief and Loss Counselling

March 272010

http://lightthewayhypnotherapy.com Grief and loss counselling hypnotherapy will help you cope with the days, weeks and months ahead and offer a series of therapeutic methods including guided imagery, meditation and gestalt therapy allowing you to find closure and communicate with your loved one.

Duration : 0:2:54

Read the rest of this entry »